Breakdown...the 'played' is the thing....HalfPastHuman ~ Clif High - is he right about this stupid lawsuit? ~ YES

Home

Breakdown...the 'played' is the thing....

with respect, let us begin.

The recent brouhaha involving David Wilcock, Ben Fulford, Kerry Cassidy and unnamed others (Anonymous) has brought to the forefront of thinking, the 'how' of it all... as in how do people, seeming reasonable and (sometimes) rational, fall for such bullshit as the currently unfolding 'lawsuit to bring down the NWO' drama. First thought, of course, is to give the benefit of the doubt, that is, to assume that our cast of 'players' are not willing, but are rather unwitting, actors within the drama currently unfolding.
Then the 'aha' moment manifests, when realization dawns that it is all a con job, and the cast is not 'players', but rather, the 'played'.
At this point there is no concern with the issue of why they fell/fall for these confidence tricks, nor is there even much concern given to the issue of 'who' is 'playing' our players. Rather the attention is directed toward the 'how' of it all.
While initially i thought to offer a breakdown of the 'lawsuit to end the NWO' as a confidence trick, showing point by point (using first Kerry's examples, and then the complete filing papers) how this game is being played, but then, tiring of restating the obvious, a much more fitting approach delivered itself. Let's make it a self teaching game.
There is a marvelous resource for trickst The Guidebook for Con Artists and Manipulatorsers and truthers available in the website of the . This web site (page 3 specifically) has a great table of contents that speaks directly to the examples that Kerry has chosen in support of her position that the lawsuit and its attendant drama is both real, and important.
While the lawsuit may indeed be existent, there is much to dispute, within its own words, that it is either real or important. In fact, when the individual paragraphs of the suit are examined, it is as though the whole of the suit was written in support of the Guidebook for Con Artists and Manipulators. The casual reader need only go to the third chapter of the Guide (Confusing reality with a story about reality) to find specific references easily observed in both Kerry's examples and the text of the suit itself. Kerry's second example:

166. These Books and Ledgers define the information that is held in the Federal
Reserve screen system. They contain the secret code cyphers and data on legal decisions,
treaties and other arrangements. Upon information and belief, they provide information
pertaining to all the accounts and sub-accounts that contain the gold and other assets, as well as
information pertaining to the financial instruments issued against the gold. Further, they specify
and provide the factual information as to what is in the Global Accounts, such as who owns the
gold and the source of its ownership. The protection and security of these Books is, therefore, of
the utmost importance and central to the authentication and verification process.-- FROM Case 1:11-cv-08500-JFK Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 79 of 114 (ACTUAL PAGE 75 per numbering on document

Now please note that this is a document, not reality. Within the document, the authors are telling a story about their view of events, and are not describing reality. The rest of the lawsuit is in similar vein. Further, there are also easily seen examples of nearly every chapter within the Guide for Con Artists on exhibit within this 'suit'.
Having read (as they say in Uber NWO world (oxford/har-vard/yale)) for 'torts and claims', in my far distant youth, and being familiar, more than most, with legal language, it is my opinion that this lawsuit is poorly written, uses legal language badly, and is very oddly constructed for a civil action seeking redress. In point of observation, it is as though the author of the lawsuit knew it would be discarded prima facia and was using the filing of the suit as an opportunity to place certain language behind a 'public record' label. This is itself a well respected confidence trick tactic, and demonstrates (variously) chapters 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of the Guide for Con Artists and Manipulators.
Further the language within the suit is written such (in my opinion as a self educated, unschooled linguist) as to proffer a story, and not as a valid (or 'real') attempt to pursue correcting an injustice in the legal system. In this regard it is my opinion that the lawsuit is 'not real'. Other problems within the structure of the suit make it plain that it will be summarily dismissed as a case without 'standing' in the legal meaning of that word. It does not read like a real case with legs, and rather presents itself as a legal straw dog with a hidden purpose in a wider plot such as supporting a disinformation and distraction campaign. Or other, larger than itself, strategy.
So the attentive reader of both the Guide for Con Artists and Manipulators, and the 'lawsuit to end the NWO' is left with several questions. The more obvious; "just who is playing David and Kerry? Is it Ben Fulford? or is he merely another victim of the 'third party deceiver' tactic? This, of course, assumes that David, Kerry and Ben are innocents... untrained in analysis, language and the wicked ways of the enemies of humanity and are thus not able to discern when they are being jerked (the common term in the 'green eyed' agencies). That being the assumption, then the cast of played players will react as they are projected, for the benefit of the game masters. That is, (especially with Wilcock as he is young (still)) and without discrimination of mind that age and suffering bring) the 'played players' will react egoistically, and try to 'defend' their at-risk-egos by 'collectivizing the experience - or sharing the blame'....which is to say, by further 'selling the story'. This, of course, is just what the con artist (in the background) wants, as it is quite true that no one can sell a con like a mark......
then the question becomes....qui bene? just who is benefiting from this game?

copyright during the winter solstice. three days of standing....
December 21, 2011 by clif high

e fu

David Icke Says Enough!

Peace
Tara on Gaia

Vet Says Soldiers Are Starting to Wake Up to Gov't Lies

Wakey Wakey!!
Hum Chi~
Tara

NANO CHEMTRAILS~ Will Thomas

If you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints.

Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart particles" the size of a single molecule.

Invisible except under the magnification of powerful microscopes, these nano-size radio-controlled chips are now being made out of mono-atomic gold particles. Networked together on the ground or assembling in the air, thousands of sensors will link into a single supercomputer no larger than a grain of sand.

Brought to you by the same military-corporate-banking complex that runs America's permanent wars, Raytheon Corp is already profiting from new weather warfare technologies. The world's fourth largest military weapons maker bought E-Systems in 1995, just one year after that military contractor bought APTI, holder of Bernard Eastlund's HAARP patents.

Raytheon also owns General Dynamics, the world's leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Raytheon also reports the weather for NOAA through its Advanced Weather Information Processing System. According to researcher Brendan Bombaci of Durango, Colorado, these Raytheon computers are directy linked with their UAV weather modification drones. Bombaci reports that NOAA paid Raytheon more than $300 million for this "currently active, 10-year project."

She goes on to describe the Joint Environmental Toolkit used by the U.S. Air Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the thing for planet tinkerers.


GREEN LIGHT
For public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized. "Microelectric Mechanical Sensors" (MMS) and "Global Environmental Mechanical Sensors" sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct 31/05]

According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress, "The green light has been given" to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for "global warming mitigation."

U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones "are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare," Military Progress asserts. This dual mission - to slow global warming and use weather as a weapon - seems somewhat contradictory.


FIGHTING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE
U.S. Military Inc. is already in the climate change business big time. The single biggest burner of petroleum on this planet, its high-flying aircraft routinely rend Earth's protective radiation shielding with nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing megatons of additional carbon, sulfur and water particles directly into the stratosphere - where they will do three-times more damage than CO2 alone.

Go figure. A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache gunship gets about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells that will continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova.

A single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14 days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half- million gallons of fuel to supply its jets.

The U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the Department of Defense's entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel aloft.

While flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050 gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135 Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650 gallons of fuel per hour.

The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.

Total it up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be eliminated by ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07; huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]


NANO RAIN
Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T

According to the air force's own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025, clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.

Then these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm's size and intensity - and "steer" it to "specific targets".

The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails "will be able to adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make adjustments throughout the process." Instead of being sprayed into the air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano versions will be able to "enhance their dispersal" by "adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy" and "communicating with each other" as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.

Nano-chemtrails will even "change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects," the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]

Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military's hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots: "Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions - clouds of microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with a control system, could provide tremendous capability."

Sounds expensive.
FULL ARTICLE CONTINUED...

http://willthomasonline.net/Nano_Chemtrails.html


Not a pretty picture, is it?  Will Thomas has been researching this since the early 90's or before, an investigative journalist... he knows his stuff.   Thanks for the updated info Will. Hope all is well for you in your part of this planet.

Blessings 2U Will.
Tara

Yet more gnawing yields nails... to the edge of the solar system and beyond.... Clif High ~ HalfPastHuman

Oh-oh, Bhatman.... the Bhat model, or helical movement and shape of the solar system model, has direct implications to both corporeal time travel, as well as 'remote viewing'.
In both cases, it now makes these concepts much more difficult to achieve. The issue is one of physical reality. If one granted the idea of moving a human body through time with the human life and consciousness intact, if only as a starting point for discussion, certain very real problems instantly arise.
Such as 'where the heck are we?', modified with specifically, 'now'. You see, without knowing exactly where we (the solar system, earth and our collective human butts) are, now, we cannot plot where the earth would have been back 'when'. Sooo...we run into a problem that did not best any movie or teevee time traveler as they all blithly stepped into their machineries and popped magically back or forth in time, but always landing on earth.
No so in a reality that supported corporeal time travel. Imagine Doc Jones and Marty's surprise when they go shuuzing back to 1955 only to pop out into empty space! That would happen even in a heliocentric model of universe unless one knows both where we are now, and where we were back when. So the Delorian time machine, or any other such contraption had better be fitted with some form of space travel, as well as being air tight and pressurized, as the mere shift of a body in time does not shift it in space.
Even with the heliocentric model of an earth orbiting a more or less stationary sun, the time traveler would also have to accomodate getting over to earth from where the current orbit would place them...and no, the earth would not be in the exact place that it is today, even in a heliocentric model, due to the presumed/described eliptical nature of the alleged orbit, as well as the fudge factor known as 'orbital drift'. So even if a heliocentric model is imagined, the complications mean that some level of 'earth is not there when i am' is bound to occur for any time traveler, forward or back.
Then, once we get a real handle on the helical motion model outlined by Dr Bhat (and others), some grasp of the problem emerges. As an instance, the difference in space between where earth was in 1955 and where it was on the same day in 1985 is completely incalculable. Yes, we truly have not the ability to calculate this due to a number of factors, not the least of which is a constant, somewhere, against which to ascertain relative movement. Even so, the best estimates would suggest that our sun is dragging us so fast through space, that the 30 years difference in positions would exceed hundreds of trillions of miles.
The difference in perspective can be summed up in the comparison of the heliocentric model in which earth is thought to be moving at 67 thousand miles per hour around a relatively stationary sun, versus the helical model in which the earth is moving at 67 thousand miles an hour within a comet-like envelope being drug along by our sun at billions of miles per hour in a spiraling path through interstellar space.
So the problem then becomes clear as Mississippi mud on a moonless midnight...if you can't tell where you are now, then you can't figure out where you were when, even if you could go be then now you would just pop out into empty space....make sense?
Similar issues affect the remote viewing crowd, specifically any of those 'formal programs' that use metric and methods based on time. That is to say, any of those in which specific coordinates on earth were referenced would be suspect, if the 'art' of remote viewing were to be subject to referential integrity rigors. That is to say, if the art were accurate anywhere, then it would have to reflect a reality in which the earth is not where the viewer thinks it is, and thus different conditions would be observed if the viewer were in fact, actually, viewing the coordinates given, the results should reflect reality, and not a common consensus view of such. Again, make any sense at all?
Stated another way, with another issue for remote viewing, especially of the 'ancient past'. No previous remote viewing session of any date prior to 1000 cce (*current common era), or rather the alleged year 1000, can have validity if the results reflected the 'common consensus view' of that reality. This is due to much of the common consensus view of history being a manufactured fake. So by way of illustration, anyone ever claiming to have viewed the crucifixion of jesus christ had better, for their own credibility, have reported their own shock at seeing everyone in the crowd wearing medieval clothes. This is but one point of illustration. Others relative to both remote viewing and channelling of 'past' entities also arise given both the helical model of the solar system as well as A. Fomenko's (and others, critical thinking into alleged history). This, and other information begs the questions of all channeler as to why they ONLY and ALWAYS support the common consensus view of history and reality.
The helical model also dooms many of the 'revelations' provided by 'telepathic contacts' over the years of UFO history. Much of the contact material from the 1950's onward can now easily be categorized as fraudulent in a prima facia case in that all the supposed aliens were JUST as ignorant as your average human of the years of the alleged contact. This is also true of the more famous, and long lived frauds such as Billy Mier. His 'revelations' and contacts are clearly bogus in that they support both heliocentricism, and the 'biblical understanding' of history. So, as with all contactees (so far), we can only get out what is in the brain of the 'contactee'. To my way of thinking, what is the point? If we are limited to Billy's ignorance as his volumes of statements now prove, then his contact, even if 'real' in a universe outside Billy's mind, is useless to the rest of us. Just more spew with no meaning.
Hmmm...so more nails in the idea of corporal (human or machines) time travel. And some serious questions for remote viewers and channelers. Not that we have much time for either any more with more practical matters pressing....
next up a rethink of the meso american, incan, mayan and south american civilizations, both as regards to their historical time lines, and the symbols that still remain. These both need to be chewed again for nutritious understandings that may come from some helical model seasoning....and of course, being linguists, we pay attention to our own words as well as those of others, and note that seasoning, and the seasons, and thus the holidays, also will benefit from a rethink, the helical motion way.
But, actually all this thinking is slowing down the next report so may put it on hold for a few days more helical spin through space, and pick it up again, when we are all.....over there in December.


copyright crunch chew grind gnaw crunch slurp November 21, 2011 by clif high

Thanx Clif....
Tara

Individually Transcend = Key to Victory ~ Michael Tsarion

Peace Michael
Thanks whirledenergy

Many Blessing Clif High~